Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rand v. Stanosheck

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

August 29, 2019

TIMOTHY E. RAND, an individual; Plaintiff,
v.
JONATHAN P. STANOSHECK, an individual; and PACIFIC REALTY COMME ASCHOFF CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Nebraska corporation; Defendants.

          AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER

          SUSAN M. BAZIS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (Filing No. 41.) The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply:

1) The Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 24, 2020 at 11:00 a.m., and will be conducted by internet/telephonic conferencing. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (If counsel wishes to appear in person, counsel must contact chambers requesting permission to do so. Before contacting chambers to request such relief, counsel shall confer regarding the issue.) The parties' proposed Pretrial Conference Order and Exhibit List(s) must be emailed to bazis@ned.uscourts.gov, in Word format, by 3:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020. The trial date in this matter is canceled and will be reset at the telephonic status conference or at the pretrial conference.
2) The telephonic conference to discuss the status of case progression, the parties' interest in settlement and trial setting is rescheduled with the undersigned magistrate judge to February 10, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (Filing No. 21).
3) Motions to compel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by December 20, 2019.
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties' dispute.
4) The deadlines for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s):
December 13, 2019
For the defendant(s):
January 17, 2020
Rebuttal:
January 30, 2020
5) The deadlines for complete expert disclosures[1] for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s):
December 13, 2019
For the defendant(s):
January 17, 2020
Plaintiff(s)' rebuttal:
January 30, 2020
6) The deposition deadline is February 28, 2020.
a. The maximum number of depositions that may be taken by the plaintiffs as a group and the defendants as a group is 15.
b. Depositions will be limited by Rule 30(d)(1).
7) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.