Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

FPP Sandbox, LLC, v. The Redstone Communications Group, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

April 16, 2019

FPP Sandbox, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff,
v.
The Redstone Communications Group, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation dba Redstone, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
Virool, Inc. a Delaware corporation, Turgo, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Alexander Debelov, Third-Party Defendants.

          FPP SANDBOX, LLC, PLAINTIFF,

          MICHAEL T. EVERSDEN, #21941 MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLO ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF.

          REDSTONE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

          BRIAN J. KOENIG, #23807 KRISTIN KRUEGER, #23919 KOLEY JESSEN P.C., L.L.O. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF.

          STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

         The parties' Joint Motion for Protective Order is granted. (See Filing No. 46). The terms, as stipulated by the parties, are as follows:

         FPP Sandbox, LLC and The Redstone Communications Group, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”) agree that during the course of discovery it may be necessary to disclose certain confidential information relating to the subject matter of this action. They agree that certain categories of information should be treated as confidential, protected from disclosure outside this litigation, and used only for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action and any appeals. The Parties jointly request entry of this proposed Protective Order to limit the disclosure, dissemination, and use of certain identified categories of confidential information.

         Protection of the identified categories of confidential information is necessary because discovery in this action will require disclosure of documents that are relevant to the claims and defenses asserted, and it is likely that such documents will contain personal information, financial information and/or proprietary or trade secret information of the parties.

         For good cause shown under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), the Court grants the Parties' joint request and hereby enters the following Protective Order:

         1. Scope.

         All information, documents and materials produced in the course of discovery of this case, including initial disclosures, all responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), are subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth below. The Order is also subject to the applicable rules of procedure and local rules on matters of procedure and calculation of time periods.

         2. Form and Timing of Designation.

         A Party may designate documents as confidential and restricted in use and disclosure under this Order by placing or affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Documents shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL prior to or at the time of the production or disclosure of the documents. Any document produced by either Party prior to entry of this Order may be designated and deemed confidential subject the terms of this Order by identifying each such document in writing within twenty (20) days of the date this Order is entered. The designation “CONFIDENTIAL” does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order.

         3. Documents Which May be Designated CONFIDENTIAL.

         Any Party may designate documents as CONFIDENTIAL upon a good faith belief that the documents contain information protected from disclosure or that should be protected from disclosure as confidential personal information, medical or psychiatric information, trade secrets, personnel records, or such other sensitive commercial and/or financial information that is not publicly available.

         4. Inadvertent Failure to Designate.

         Inadvertent failure to designate any documents as “CONFIDENTIAL, ” in itself, will not constitute a waiver of an otherwise valid claim of confidentiality pursuant to this Order, so long as a claim of confidentiality is asserted within thirty (30) days after discovery of the inadvertent failure.

         5. Depositions

         Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within thirty (30) days after receipt of the deposition transcript, in writing. Such designation must be specific as to the portions of the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected.

         6. Protection of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.