Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rosales v. Heath

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

September 21, 2018

EUGENE ROSALES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ; Plaintiff,
JOHN C. HEATH, Attorney at Law; Defendant.

          Julie D. Hoffmeister David N. Anthony TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP.

          Sergei Lemberg LEMBERG LAW.


          Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Eugene Rosales and Defendant John C. Heath Attorney at Law, PLLC dba Lexington Law Firm, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows:

         WHEREAS, documents, testimony and information have been and may be sought, produced or exhibited by and among the parties relating to trade secrets, proprietary systems, confidential commercial information, confidential research and development, or other proprietary information belonging to Defendant and/or credit and other confidential information of Plaintiff and third parties.

         THEREFORE, this Court orders as follows:

         1. This Order shall govern the use, handling, and disclosure of all document s, testimony or information produced or given in this action which are designated to be subject to this Order.

         2. Any documents, testimony or information submitted, either voluntarily or pursuant to any subsequent order, which is asserted in good faith by the producing party or by any other party to contain or constitute information protected by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or other provision of law asserted by the producing party, shall be so designated in writing, or orally at a deposition, hearing or trial and shall be segregated from other information being submitted. Materials so designated shall be clearly marked on their face with the legend: “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY.” Such documents, transcripts, or other materials are referred herein as “CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS” and “CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS, ” respectively.

         3. A party wishing to designate portions of a deposition transcript CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to this Order must, within two (2) business days from the conclusion of the deposition, order the original or a copy of the transcript of the deposition from the court reporter for regular turnaround. The designating party may designate those portions of the transcript CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY, in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Order. The designating party shall designate such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIAL either on the record or by serving upon all counsel of record via facsimile or other electronic transmission a Notice setting forth the page, line numbers and designation. The designating party must serve such Notice within ten (10) calendar days after its counsel receives a copy of the deposition transcript. All transcripts ordered within two (2) business days from the conclusion of the deposition will be treated as confidential until the expiration of the ten (10) day period described in this paragraph. Any portions of a transcript designated as confidential shall thereafter be treated as confidential in accordance with this Order. The parties shall negotiate in good faith to alter the time frames set forth in this paragraph in situations where a more expedited filing of a designated portion of the deposition transcript is required.

         4. All CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS and CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS, and all information derived therefrom (including but not limited to all testimony, deposition or otherwise, that refers, reflects or otherwise discusses any such materials), shall not be used, directly or indirectly, by any person for any business, commercial or competitive purposes or for any purpose whatsoever other than solely for the preparation and trial of this action in accordance with this Order.

         5. In the absence of prior written permission from the designating party or an order by the Court, CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS shall not be disclosed to any person other than: (i) the parties and their attorneys of record, and those attorneys' support staff employees who perform work tasks related to this case; (ii) qualified persons taking testimony involving such material and necessary stenographic and clerical personnel; (iii) disclosed experts or consulting experts and their staff employed for this litigation; (iv) present or former employees of the producing party in connection with their depositions in this action (provided that no former employees shall be shown documents prepared after the date of his or her departure); (v) outside photocopying and electronic discovery vendors; and (vi) the Court, Court personnel, and members of any jury impaneled to hear this case.

         6. CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS and CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS shall not be disclosed to any person designated in paragraph 5(iii) unless he or she has executed a written, dated declaration in the form attached as Exhibit A, acknowledging that he or she has first read this Order, agreed to be bound by the terms thereof, agreed not to reveal such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS to anyone, and agreed to utilize such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS solely for the purposes of this litigation. All persons to whom CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS are disclosed are hereby enjoined from disclosing same to any other person except as provided in this Order, and are also enjoined from using same except in the preparation for and trial of this case between the named parties thereto. No. person receiving or reviewing CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS shall disseminate or disclose them to any person other than those described above in Paragraph 5 and for the purposes specified, and in no event shall such person make any other use of such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS or CONFIDENTIAL-AEO MATERIALS.

         7. Inadvertent failure to designate any document or material as containing Confidential Information will not constitute a waiver of an otherwise valid claim of confidentiality pursuant to this Order, so long as a claim of confidentiality is promptly asserted after discovery of the inadvertent failure .If a party designates a document as Confidential Information after it was initially produced, the receiving party, on notification of the designation, must make a reasonable effort to assure that the document is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order, and upon request from the producing party certify that the designated documents have been maintained as Confidential Information.

         8. With regard to claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material asserted after production, the parties have agreed to an order as follows: Inadvertent disclosure of information or any documents (including electronic data) that contain information protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine shall not waive any attorney-client privilege or work product privilege applicable to that information, document, or subject matter. As soon as practicable, the producing party shall inform the receiving party, in writing, that the information or document is subject to a legitimate claim of privilege and the return of the information or document is promptly requested. As soon as practicable ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.