Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Canning v. Creighton University

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

August 7, 2018

MARY E. CANNING, Plaintiff,
v.
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

          PROTECTIVE ORDER

          Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge.

         This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation and motion for a protective order concerning the production of documents by the defendant Creighton University (“the University”) (filing 31).

         The court finds that the parties have stipulated and agreed that:

         1. Discovery in this action may involve the production of documents and disclosure of information which the University claims to be confidential;

         2. The parties desire to pursue discovery with a minimum of delay and expense; and

         3. The parties have agreed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rules 29 and 26(c) and NELR 7.3 that a protective order should be entered in connection with the production of documents and disclosure of information by the University.

         The court finds that the joint motion should be granted.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AGREED:

         1. When used in this order, the word "documents" has the full extent of its meaning as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and includes all written, recorded or graphic matter whatsoever, in paper or electronic form, including interrogatory answers, requests to admit and responses thereto, documents produced by any party to this action whether pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26, 34, by subpoena duces tecum or by agreement, deposition transcripts and exhibits, and any portion of any Court papers which quote from any of the foregoing.

         2. As used in this order, the words "personnel records" means records of current or former residents or other employees of the University.

         3. All documents and disclosure of information pertaining to personnel records and every portion thereof, produced by the University, pursuant to any discovery procedure or informal exchange of documents in this matter, shall be considered "confidential" for purposes of this order and shall be used by the non-producing parties, their experts and attorneys, only for the preparation for and conduct of proceedings herein and not for any business or other purpose whatsoever. Documents which were prepared by and obtained from any individual, entity or agency other than the University or a person acting for the University and which would be discoverable from that entity, agency, or person shall not be deemed confidential for purposes of this order.

         4. Except as hereinafter provided, no confidential documents or disclosure information, nor any portion or summary thereof, produced by the University shall be given, shown, disclosed, or communicated by the parties in any way, directly or indirectly, to any person or entity other than:

         (a) Counsel for the parties in this ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.