Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Travelex Insurance Services, Inc. v. Barty

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

May 23, 2018

TRAVELEX INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation Plaintiff,
v.
LYNN BARTY, Defendant.

          AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER

          Susan M. Bazis, United States Magistrate Judge

         A proposed amended protective order was submitted to the Court for review. Having considered the matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an amended protective order is entered as follows:

         1. Nondisclosure of Confidential Documents

         (a) Except with prior written consent of the party designating a document to be protected from disclosure, no document designated as CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed to any person or entity. A party who produces material may designate it as CONFIDENTIAL only when the party in good faith believes it contains proprietary information or trade secrets, privileged information, or nonpublic technical, financial, personal or business information. A document designated as CONFIDENTIAL means any document which bears the legend "CONFIDENTIAL."

         (b) The parties and Arch may further restrict such designations for proprietary/trade secret information as "CONFIDENTIAL FOR ATTORNEY EYES ONLY" in which case only the attorneys for the parties or Arch Insurance Group Inc. and its affiliate Arch Insurance Company ("Arch") may have copies of the documents and may not provide copies to their clients or any third party except upon order of the Court or written permission of the producing party. All documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL by Plaintiff under the previous Protective Order (Doc. No. 25) dated March 16, 2018 shall be considered designated as “CONFIDENTIAL FOR ATTORNEY EYES ONLY” with respect to Arch. Furthermore, a designation as “CONFIDENTIAL FOR ATTORNEY EYES ONLY” shall not apply to the customers identified by Defendant pursuant to the Court's Order dated May 8, 2018 (Doc. No. 36).

         (c) A party receiving from another party any document that has been designated as CONFIDENTIAL may object in writing to the designation and must state the reasons for such objection with respect to each item. The parties shall then meet and confer in good faith regarding the designation. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement regarding the designation, the party challenging the designation shall be obligated to file a motion with the Court challenging such designation.

         (d) This Amended Protective Order shall be without prejudice to the right of any party to: bring before the Court at any time the question of whether any information or documents are confidential; object to the production of any information or documents it reasonably considers not subject to discovery or object to their use at trial; and/or apply to or move the Court for an order compelling production of information or documents or modifying this Order.

         2. Permissible Disclosures of Stamped Confidential Documents

         Notwithstanding paragraph 1, documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed to:

(a) the parties and their legal counsel in these proceedings;
(b) partners, associates, secretaries, paralegal assistants, and employees of such counsel to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in the litigation;
(c) persons with prior knowledge of the documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL and confidential information contained therein;
(d) experts who will be providing professional opinions based upon a review of the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.