Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McCullough v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Nebraska

April 26, 2018

Wallace R. McCullough, appellant,
Michelle A. McCullough. appellee.

         1. Contempt: Appeal and Error. In a civil contempt proceeding where a party seeks remedial relief for an alleged violation of a court order, an appellate court employs a three-part standard of review in which (1) the trial court's resolution of issues of law is reviewed de novo, (2) the trial court's factual findings are reviewed for clear error, and (3) the trial court's determinations of whether a party is in contempt and of the sanction to be imposed are reviewed for abuse of discretion.

         2. Attorney Fees: Appeal and Error. A trial court's decision awarding or denying attorney fees will be upheld on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.

         3. Judgments: Words and Phrases. A judicial abuse of discretion requires that the reasons or rulings of the trial court be clearly untenable insofar as they unfairly deprive a litigant of a substantial right and a just result.

         4. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. A jurisdictional question which does not involve a factual dispute is determined by an appellate court as a matter of law.

         5. Judges: Recusal: Appeal and Error. A motion requesting a judge to recuse himself or herself on the ground of bias or prejudice is addressed to the discretion of the judge, and an order overruling such a motion will be affirmed on appeal unless the record establishes bias or prejudice as a matter of law.

         6. Contempt: Final Orders. An order of contempt in a postjudgment proceeding to enforce a previous final judgment is properly classified as a final order.

         7. Contempt. Civil contempt proceedings are instituted to preserve and enforce the rights of private parties to a suit when a party fails to comply with a court order made for the benefit of the opposing party.

         [299 Neb. 720] 8. Courts: Jurisdiction: Divorce: Contempt. A court's continuing jurisdiction over a dissolution decree includes the power to provide equitable relief in a contempt proceeding.

         9. Contempt: Courts: Equity. Contempt proceedings may both compel obedience to orders and administer the remedies to which the court has found the parties to be entitled. Where a situation exists that is contrary to the principles of equity and which can be redressed within the scope of judicial action, a court of equity will devise a remedy to meet the situation.

         10. Contempt: Words and Phrases. Civil contempt requires willful disobedience as an essential element. "Willful" means the violation was committed intentionally, with knowledge that the act violated the court order. If it is impossible to comply with the order of the court, the failure to comply is not willful.

         11. Words and Phrases: Appeal and Error. Willfulness is a factual determination to be reviewed for clear error.

         12. Contempt: Proof: Evidence: Presumptions. Outside of statutory procedures imposing a different standard or an evidentiary presumption, all elements of contempt must be proved by the complainant by clear and convincing evidence and without any presumptions.

         13. Contempt: Costs: Attorney Fees. Costs, including reasonable attorney fees, can be awarded in a contempt proceeding.

         14. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. Before reaching the legal issues presented for review, it is the duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before it.

          Appeals from the District Court for Sarpy County: Daniel E. Bryan, Jr., Judge. Judgments in Nos. S-16-1086 and S-17-037 affirmed. Appeal in No. S-16-1187 dismissed.

          William D. Gilner for appellant.

          Edith T. Peebles and Tosha Rae D. Heavican, of Brodkey, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P, for appellee.

          Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, and Funke, JJ.

          MILLER-LERMAN, J.


         In these three consolidated appeals, Wallace R. McCullough appeals orders entered by the district court for Sarpy County [299 Neb. 721] in the proceeding for the dissolution of his marriage to Michelle A. McCullough. Wallace appeals, inter alia, an order of contempt for failing to make childcare and property division equalization payments, an order of contempt for failing to pay child support, and an order setting the amount of a supersedeas bond. We dismiss the appeal of the order regarding the amount of the supersedeas bond, and we affirm the district court's orders in the two other appeals.


         On March 22, 2010, the district court for Sarpy County entered a decree dissolving Wallace and Michelle's marriage. In the decree of dissolution, the district court ordered, inter alia, that legal and physical custody of the couple's children be awarded to Michelle, subject to Wallace's parenting time; that Wallace pay Michelle child support of $3, 005 per month; that Wallace pay a share of childcare expenses incurred by Michelle; and that Wallace pay Michelle $552, 124.89 to equalize the property division, payable at a rate of $50, 000 per year plus interest until paid in full.

         On June 12, 2012, Michelle filed a complaint for modification of the decree of dissolution. She requested, inter alia, that Wallace's parenting time be supervised and that proceeds from the sale of certain property be reassigned to her. On July 30, Wallace filed an answer and a counterclaim in which he requested, inter alia, that he be awarded sole custody of the children. On August 6, Michelle filed an answer to Wallace's counterclaim in which she requested the counterclaim be dismissed. On August 7, Wallace filed an amended answer and counterclaim in which he further requested, inter alia, a change in his child support obligation based on a change in income and that he be given credit for amounts totaling $268, 400 that he alleged should be treated as having been paid toward the property settlement. On January 21, 2014, Wallace filed another amended answer and counterclaim in which he made additional allegations and requests.

         [299 Neb. 722] On June 8, 2016, Michelle filed a verified complaint for contempt in which she alleged that Wallace had failed to pay child support, childcare expenses, and property equalization payments required under the decree of dissolution. The district court entered an order on June 13 for Wallace to show cause why he should not be held in contempt ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.