Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McNeil v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

September 19, 2017

TASHA M. MCNEIL, Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

          SECOND AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE

          Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge

         This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines (Filing No. 32). The Court held a Scheduling Conference regarding the motion on September 19, 2017, with counsel for the parties appearing by telephone. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 concerning matters of importance in scheduling this case, and in accordance with the matters discussed at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines (Filing No. 32) is granted as follows:

         1. Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment. Motions to Dismiss and/or Motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than January 5, 2018. See NECivR 56.1 and NECivR 7.1.

         2. Discovery Deadlines:

         a. Deposition Deadline. All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by December 1, 2017.

         b. Written Discovery Deadline. All interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production or inspection, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by November 1, 2017. Counsel may stipulate to extensions of time to respond to discovery requests in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 29, but such extensions shall not extend any of the dates in this order; any request to extend the deadlines of this order shall be sought by motion.

         3. Pretrial Disclosures. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3), each party shall serve opposing counsel and file a redacted version as applicable with the following information regarding the evidence it may present at trial other than solely for impeachment purposes as soon as practicable but not later than the date specified:

         a. Nonexpert Witnesses - On or before May 16, 2018: The name, address and telephone number[1] of each witness, separately identifying those whom the party expects to present and those whom the party may call if the need arises.

         b. Deposition Testimony and Discovery - The designation of discovery testimony and discovery responses intended to be utilized at trial is not required at this time.

         c. Trial Exhibits - On or before May 16, 2018: A list of all exhibits it expects to offer by providing a numbered listing and permitting examination of such exhibits, designating on the list those exhibits it may offer only if the need arises.

         d. Waiver of Objections. Any and all objections to the use of the witnesses, deposition testimony, discovery responses, or exhibits disclosed pursuant to the above subparagraphs, including any objection pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 32(a) that a deponent is available to testify at the trial, shall be made a part of the pretrial order. Failure to list objections (except those under Fed.R.Evid. 402 and 403) is a waiver of such objections, unless excused by the Court for good cause shown.

         4. Motions in Limine.

         a. Motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial under Fed.R.Evid. 702, seeKumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed by January 5, 2018, and accompanied by a request for a hearing if necessary. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.