Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Olea

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

May 11, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JUAN CARLOS OLEA, Defendant.

          DETENTION ORDER PENDING TRIAL

          Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge

         This matter came on for a detention hearing on the 5th day of May, 2017. The Court heard testimony from a potential third party custodian, Maria Olea. The Court also heard arguments of the parties. At the conclusion of the hearing the Court ordered pretrial services to interview the potential third party custodian, Maria Olea, and an additional potential third party custodian, Estela Macias Olea. Pretrial Services has completed their interviews and has filed a second addendum to the pretrial services report, which the Court has reviewed. (Filing No. 36).

         Maria Olea is the defendant's cousin and she last saw and had contact with the defendant in December of 2015. Maria Olea has no knowledge about methamphetamine. Maria Olea's husband is not a legal resident of the United States. In addition, Maria Olea's father is a Co-Defendant in this case. For all of these reasons, the Court cannot find Maria Olea to be a suitable third party custodian.

         Estela Macias Olea is the defendant's half-sister and resides in Arizona. Estela Olea just moved because she was evicted from her last residence for having too many people living in her apartment. There is no lease on the new residence, which is a month-to-month tenancy. Estela Olea is not employed. Estela Olea's father is living with her and is currently going through the court system for a Driving Under the Influence charge. Estela Olea herself has a warrant in Colorado for missing court on a leaving the scene of an accident charge. For all of these reasons, the court cannot find that Estela Macias Olea is a suitable third party custodian.

         The court grants the governments oral Motion for Detention and further finds as follows:

         A. Order For Detention

         X After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (I).

         __ After the defendant waived a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).

         B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention

         The Court orders the defendant's detention because it finds:

         X By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.

         X By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person or the community.

         C. Finding Of Fact

         The Court's findings are based on the evidence which was presented in court and that which was contained in the Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:

X (1) Nature and circumstances of the offense charged:
X (a) The crime(s): (Count I), Conspiracy to Distribute andPossession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine, and (Count III), Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering are serious crimes and carry a maximum penalty of Life imprisonment as to Count I, and 20 years imprisonment ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.