Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Oriental Trading Co., Inc. v. Yagoozon, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

January 7, 2016

ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and FUN EXPRESS, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
YAGOOZON, INC., a Rhode Island corporation, Defendant.

4TH AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER

LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Progression Order [121].

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Mandatory Disclosures.

The mandatory disclosures described in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) shall be completed by March 14, 2014. The parties shall file any objections to jurisdiction and venue on or before April 14, 2014. Any response to the objections shall be filed on or before May 16, 2014. If no objections have been filed, then the matter will have been deemed waived to this court’s jurisdiction and venue.

2. Discovery Deadline.

All discovery, whether or not intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by November 3, 2015. All interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production or inspection, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be served sufficiently early to allow rule time response before that date. Counsel may stipulate to extensions of time to respond to discovery requests in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 29, as amended, but such extensions shall not extend any of the dates in this order; any requests for extensions of any of the deadlines herein shall be made by appropriate motion and order.

3. Limits on Discovery.

Each party is limited to serving twenty-five (25) interrogatories, including subparts, on any other party. Each party is limited to taking twelve (12) depositions in this case, excluding expert depositions, without leave of court. Depositions shall be limited by Rule 30(d)(2) except the deposition of corporate designation under 30(b)(6).

4. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses.[1]

On or before September 2, 2015, the plaintiff shall identify all expert witnesses and shall serve the defendant with the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness it expects to call to testify at trial pursuant to the provisions of Rule 702, 703 or 705, Fed. Rules of Evidence. On or before October 5, 2015, the defendant shall identify all expert witnesses and shall serve the plaintiff with the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness it expects to call to testify at trial pursuant to the provisions of Rules 702, 703, or 705, Federal Rules of Evidence. If necessary to refute the disclosed opinions of an expert witness of an opponent, a party may disclose additional expert witnesses not later than October 19, 2015, provided that the disclosing party then provides all of the information described in Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 26(a)(2) and makes the expert witness available for deposition prior to the date set for completion of deposition. Supplementation of these disclosures, if originally made prior to these deadlines, shall be made on these deadlines as to any information for which supplementation is addressed in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e). The testimony of the expert at trial shall be limited to the information disclosed in accordance with this paragraph.

5. Pretrial Disclosures:

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3), each party shall provide to all other parties the following information regarding the evidence that it may present at trial other than solely for impeachment purposes as ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.