Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fjellin v. Frauenshuh Hospitality Group of Minnesota

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

September 8, 2015

JACQUELINE C. FJELLIN, AND for and as Trustees of the Leonard Van Liew Living Trust; and JAMES J. VAN LIEW, for and as Trustees of the Leonard Van Liew Living Trust; Plaintiffs,
v.
FRAUENSHUH HOSPITALITY GROUP OF MINNESOTA, a Minnesota limited liability company; Defendant.

SCHEDULING ORDER

CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Mandatory disclosures shall be served by October 6, 2015.
2) Counsel for the parties shall confer and, on or before September 29, 2015, they shall jointly file an abbreviated Rule 26(f) Report, a copy of which is attached.
3) If one or more of the parties believes a planning conference is needed to complete the abbreviated Rule 26(f) Report, or if the parties cannot agree on one or more of the deadlines identified or case progression issues raised in the attached Rule 26(f) Report, on or before September 22, 2015, a party shall contact my chambers at (402) 437-1670, or by email addressed to zwart@ned.uscourts.gov, to arrange a conference call.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

The following attorneys conferred to prepare the Report of Parties' Planning Conference for the above-captioned case:

(Identify, for each party, the counsel who participated in preparing the Rule 26(f) Report).

The parties discussed the case and jointly make the following report:

CASE PROGRESSION:

A. Do any of the parties believe a planning conference would be beneficial and/or should be held before a final scheduling order is entered? _____ Explain. __________________________________________________________.

B. Motions to amend the pleadings or to add parties.

1) The plaintiff

_____ does
_____ does not

anticipate need to amend pleadings or add parties. Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by _______________.

2) The defendant

_____ does
_____ does not
anticipate need to amend pleadings or add parties. Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by _______________.
If more than ninety days are needed, state the reason(s) why such time is ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.