Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jamie N. v. Kenneth M.

Court of Appeals of Nebraska

July 7, 2015

JAMIE N., ON BEHALF OF MADISON N., APPELLANT,
v.
KENNETH M., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, APPELLEE, AND ERIC C., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, APPELLEE

Page 291

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 292

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 293

Appeal from the District Court for Sarpy County: WILLIAM B. ZASTERA, Judge.

David J. Reed, of Jorgenson & Reed, L.L.C., and, on brief, W. Gregory Lake for appellant.

Charles L. Grimes, of Vacanti Shattuck, for appellee Eric C.

INBODY, PIRTLE, and BISHOP, Judges.

OPINION

Page 294

[23 Neb.App. 3] Bishop, Judge.

Jamie N. filed the present action on behalf of her minor child, Madison N., born in July 2011, against Kenneth M. and Eric C. in Sarpy County District Court, seeking to rescind Kenneth's acknowledgment of paternity of Madison and to establish Eric's paternity of Madison (genetic testing established that Eric is Madison's biological father). Kenneth moved for summary judgment, seeking that the district court [23 Neb.App. 4] rescind his acknowledgment of paternity; the district court granted his motion and rescinded his acknowledgment. In a subsequent order, the district court granted Eric's motion for summary judgment,

Page 295

concluding that Jamie's action to establish his paternity was barred by res judicata and issue preclusion because both the State and Jamie had previously filed complaints against Eric, to establish his paternity, that had been dismissed. Jamie appeals from the order of summary judgment in favor of Eric.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Jamie and Kenneth were involved in an intimate relationship between September and November 2010. According to Kenneth, he did not date or have a relationship with anyone else during this time and it was his understanding that Jamie also was not in a relationship with anyone else at that time. Kenneth averred that Jamie informed him she was pregnant in the fall of 2010 and told him he was the father and that he had no reason to disbelieve her.

Jamie gave birth to Madison in July 2011. Two days after Madison's birth, Kenneth signed a notarized acknowledgment of paternity. Kenneth claimed that he would not have signed the acknowledgment of paternity had he known it was possible he was not the father.

In November 2011, Kenneth and Jamie obtained a DNA test demonstrating that he was not the father of Madison.

According to Jamie, at the time Madison was conceived, Jamie was involved in sexual relationships with both Kenneth and Eric, but believed Kenneth had a better chance of being the father than Eric and " mistakenly" told Kenneth he was the father. After Jamie learned she had " made a mistake" in determining that Kenneth was Madison's father, she contacted the State of Nebraska to initiate an action on behalf of Madison against Eric. Before the State commenced the action, Eric submitted to a DNA test, which found a 99-percent probability that he was the father of Madison.

[23 Neb.App. 5] Jamie claimed that neither Kenneth nor Eric has had any substantial contact with Madison during her life; Kenneth had seen her twice, and Eric had seen her once. Madison has numerous health issues, and Jamie believed that establishing Eric as Madison's father would help ensure Madison receives proper medical treatment, because doctors would know her full family medical history.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.