Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Obst v. Nebraska Department of Corrections

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

June 10, 2015

BRIAN OBST, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FRED BRITTON, and SCOTT FRAKES, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.

This matter is before the court for case management. Brian Obst filed a Complaint (Filing No. 1) on May 26, 2015, concerning prison conditions at the Diagnostic and Evaluation Center in Lincoln, Nebraska. Numerous prisoner plaintiffs signed the Complaint and numerous others have filed motions in this case seeking to proceed as plaintiffs. They include: Andre Thomas, Anthony Hancock, Brian Obst, Brian Spotts, Chris McWilliams, Cory Mattly, DeAnthony McGuire, Eric Berning, Ernest Lawrence, Josh Lawver, Justin James Seffron, Kenneth Hoelk, Kurt Brown, Lamont Stuart, Matthew Miller, Matthew Meyer, Michael Fleming, Orlando Brewer, Ricky Fletcher, Scott Kornahrens, Thad Junge, Walter Minshall, and William Jordan.

Brian Obst delivered the Complaint to the court, and his name appears first on the pleadings. Therefore, the court considers Brian Obst the "lead plaintiff" in this case. The court considers the other individuals listed above the "co-plaintiffs" in this case.

Prisoners are allowed to file joint civil rights complaints in this district if the criteria of permissible joinder under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 are satisfied. However, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, each prisoner in a joint action must pay the full civil filing fee, even if he is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Cole v. Houston, No. 4:06cv3314, 2007 WL 1309821 (D. Neb. March 30, 2007). In other words, each prisoner in a joint action must pay the full civil filing fee, just as if he had filed the suit individually.

Because not every prisoner is likely to be aware of the potential negative consequences of joining group litigation in the federal courts, this court will alert the plaintiffs to the individual payment requirement, as well as other risks they face in joint pro se litigation.[1] The court offers the co-plaintiffs an opportunity to withdraw from this litigation before the case progresses further. Each of the co-plaintiffs should consider the following points when deciding whether or not to withdraw as a plaintiff from this case:

• He must pay the full $350 filing fee, either in installments or in full, regardless of whether this action is dismissed, severed, or allowed to proceed as a group complaint.

• He will be held legally responsible for knowing precisely what is being filed in the case on his behalf.

• He will be subject to sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 if such sanctions are found warranted in any aspect of the case.

• He will incur a strike if the action is dismissed as frivolous or malicious or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.[2]

• In screening the complaint, the court will consider whether unrelated claims should be severed and, if it decides severance is appropriate, he will be required to prosecute his claims in a separate action and pay a separate filing fee for each new action.

All of the plaintiffs must note that any proposed amended complaint or other document filed on behalf of multiple plaintiffs must be signed by each of the plaintiffs. As long as the plaintiffs appear without counsel in this action, each plaintiff must sign documents for himself. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. A non-attorney cannot file or sign papers for another litigant. All of the plaintiffs are WARNED that future group motions or pleadings that do not comply with this requirement will be stricken pursuant to Rule 11(a).

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Each co-plaintiff-Andre Thomas, Anthony Hancock, Brian Spotts, Chris McWilliams, Cory Mattly, DeAnthony McGuire, Eric Berning, Ernest Lawrence, Josh Lawver, Justin James Seffron, Kenneth Hoelk, Kurt Brown, Lamont Stuart, Matthew Miller, Matthew Meyer, Michael Fleming, Orlando Brewer, Ricky Fletcher, Scott Kornahrens, Thad Junge, Walter Minshall, and William Jordan-has 30 days to advise the court in writing whether he wishes to continue as a plaintiff in this group action. If, by that deadline, any co-plaintiff advises the court that he does not wish to participate in the action, he will be dismissed from the lawsuit and will not be charged a filing fee for this action.[3] This is the only way to avoid the obligation to pay a filing fee for this action.

Alternatively, if any plaintiff wants to pursue his claims individually in a separate lawsuit, he must so advise the court in writing, and his claims will be severed into a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.