Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Prism Technologies LLC v. At&T Mobility, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nebraska

September 17, 2014

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, Defendant.

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Jonathan S. Caplan, Mark A. Baghdassarian, Aaron M. Frankel, Marcus A. Colucci, Matthew W. Olinzock, Cristina Martinez, New York, NY Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Paul Andre, Lisa Kobialka, William Hannah, Menlo Park, CA, Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O. Michael C. Cox, Daniel J. Fischer, Omaha, NE, Andre J. Bahou, Vice President & Chief IP Officer Prism Technologies LLC, Brentwood, TN, Attorney for Plaintiff Prism Technologies LLC.

Steven M. Zager, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, New York, NY, Kirt S. O'Neill, G. Andrew Rosbrook, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, San Antonio, TX, James M. Sulentic, John P. Passarelli, KUT AK, ROCK LAW FIRM, Omaha, NE, David R. Clonts, Manoj S. Gandhi, Sarah J. Ring, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, Houston, TX, Amanda R. Johnson, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, Washington, DC, Kellie M. Johnson, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, Dallas, TX, Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC.

ORDER ON FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

A final pretrial conference was held on the 17th day of September, 2014. Appearing for the parties as counsel were:

Jonathan S. Caplan and Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036, Paul Andre and Lisa Kobialka, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, 990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, Andre J. Bahou, Prism Technologies, LLC, 878 Arlington Heights Dr., Suite 400, Brentwood, TN 37027, and Daniel J. Fischer, Koley Jessen PC, 1125 S. 103rd St., Suite 800, Omaha, NE 68124 for Plaintiff Prism Technologies LLC ("Prism").

Steven M. Zager, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, One Bryant Park, Bank of America Tower, New York, NY 10036; David Clonts, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 1111 Louisiana Street, Houston, TX 77002; Kellie M. Johnson, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100, Dallas, TX 75201; John P. Passarelli and Todd C. Kinney, Kutak Rock LLP, 1650 Farnam Street, Omaha, NE 68102 for Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC.

(A) Exhibits

Prism's proposed trial exhibit list, along with AT&T's objections, is provided as Attachment A. AT&T's proposed trial exhibit list, along with Prim's objections, is provided as Attachment B.

(B) Uncontroverted Facts. The parties have agreed that the following may be accepted as established facts for purposes of this case only:

1. The lawsuit was filed on April 4, 2012.
2. Plaintiff Prism is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State ofNebraska, with its principal place of business at 2323 S. 171st Street, Suite 106, Omaha, Nebraska 68130.
3. Prism is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 8, 127, 345 ("the 345 Patent") and 8, 387, 155 ("the 155 Patent") (collectively "the Asserted Patents").
4. The 345 Patent issued on February 28, 2012.
5. The 345 Patent has an effective U.S. filing date of June 11, 1997.
6. The 155 Patent issued on February 26, 2013.
7. The 155 Patent has an effective U.S. filing date of June 11, 1997.
8. Prism has not made, sold, or offered for sale any product covered by the patents-in-suit since the patents-in-suit issued.
9. Defendant AT&T is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place ofbusiness at 1025 Lenox Park Blvd., N.E., Atlanta, GA XXXXX-XXXX.

(C) Controverted and Unresolved Issues. The issues remaining to be determined and unresolved matters for the court's attention are:

1. Prism's Claims as to AT&T:
a. Whether AT&T is liable for direct infringement of claims 1, 33, 39, 50, 57, 70, 77 and 87 of the 345 patent.
b. Whether AT&T is liable for contributory infringement of claims 1, 33, 39, 50, 57, 70, 77 and 87 of the 345 patent.
c. Whether AT&T is liable for inducing infringement of claims 1, 33, 39, 50, 57, 70, 77 and 87 of the 345 patent.
d. Whether AT&T is liable for direct infringement of claims 7, 11, 32, 37, 50, 56, 74, 75, 76 and 93 of the 155 patent.
e. Whether AT&T is liable for contributory infringement of claims 7, 11, 32, 37, 50, 56, 74, 75, 76 ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.