United States District Court, D. Nebraska
AMENDED ORDER ON SENTENCING SCHEDULE
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Chief District Judge.
Before the court is defendant's Motion to Continue deadlines . Counsel did not receive the presentence report until February 5, 2014 (originally due January 13, 2014). For that reason, the motion will be granted and the Order on Sentencing Schedule will be amended as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the following deadlines and procedures are set in this case:
4. February 20, 2014: Objections by counsel to the initial presentence report;
5. March 3, 2014: Probation office's submission to the judge and counsel of initial or revised presentence report with changes, if any, responsive to counsels' objections, and, if needed, an addendum explaining the probation officer's position regarding any objections to the presentence report previously submitted by counsel;
6. March 10, 2014:
(a) Any proposals to the probation office for community service, community confinement, intermittent confinement or home detention;
(b) Motions to the court:
(1) for departure under the guidelines (including, but not limited to, motions by the government); and
(2) for deviation or variance from the guidelines as allowed by the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker , 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005) or its progeny;
(c) Counsel's filing and serving on all other parties and the probation officer a written statement of position respecting each of the unresolved objections to the presentence report, including the specific nature of each objection to the presentence report.
(d) If evidence is to be offered in support of or in opposition to a motion under subparagraph (b) of this paragraph or in support of or in opposition to an objection under subparagraph (c) of this paragraph 6, it must be: by affidavit, letter, report or other document attached to the statement of position or by oral testimony at the sentencing hearing. If oral testimony is desired, a request must be made in the statement of position and the statement of position must reveal (1) the nature of the expected testimony, (2) the necessity for oral testimony, instead of documentary evidence, such as affidavits, (3) the identity of each proposed witness, and (4) the length of time anticipated for presentation of the direct examination of the witness or witnesses. If a request for oral or documentary evidence is made by one party but not by the adverse party, the adverse party within five working days thereafter may make a responsive request for oral or documentary evidence, setting out details in the same manner as required by this paragraph 6(d).
(e) Motions for departure should be supported by a brief that explains why the departure from the guideline sentencing range is justified by normal guideline departure theory. Motions for deviation or variance from the guidelines as allowed under Booker or its progeny should be supported by a brief that explains why a sentence other than that called for under the guidelines is justified by a principle of law that is different in kind or degree from the normal principles of law applied under a strict application of the guidelines.
(f) It is expected that any objection first raised in a party's statement of position will be addressed at the judge's discretion, and that no consideration will be given to any sentencing factor ...