Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Haugh

United States District Court, Eighth Circuit

December 18, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES B. HAUGH, Defendant.

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.

The indictment in this case (filing 1) charged the defendant with one count of receipt or distribution of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A), and one count of possession of a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). The indictment contained a forfeiture allegation seeking the forfeiture of, among other things, "any and all property used or intended to be used in any manner or part to commit and to promote the commission of the aforementioned violation." Filing 1 at 2.

The defendant has been found guilty by jury verdict on Count 1 of the indictment. The parties were asked whether either would request a jury determination of forfeiture pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(5), and neither party made such a request. The parties were also asked whether either would request a hearing or offer additional evidence or information relevant to forfeiture pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(1)(B); neither party requested a hearing, and both parties indicated that they would submit the issue on the trial record. The matter of forfeiture is, therefore, submitted to the Court on the evidence already in the record. See id.

The Court finds, from the evidence, that trial exhibits 1-4 are subject to forfeiture, as follows:

1. HP Desktop (Serial #MXL0481160), with ITB Hitachi Hard Drive (Serial #JP2940HD2X4HBC)
2. Seagate External Hard Drive (Serial #4LJ2N7G2)
3. Western Digital External Drive (Serial #WCAUF0133038)
4. SanDisk Cruzer Glide USB Flash Drive

The evidence presented at trial-in particular, the presence of the contraband on these devices and the testimony of government investigators Kerry Crosby and Ed Sexton describing how the devices were used to obtain the contraband-establish the requisite nexus between the property and the offense by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Hull, 606 F.3d 524, 527 (8th Cir. 2010) (burden of proof). Specifically, the evidence establishes that exhibits 1-4 were used to commit the offense of conviction, and as a result, the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253(a)(3).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The plaintiff is authorized to seize trial exhibits 1-4, as specifically described above.
2. The defendant's interest in the property is forfeited to the plaintiff for disposition in accordance with law, subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 2253.
3. The property is to be held by the plaintiff in its secure custody and control.
4. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253, the plaintiff shall publish for at least thirty consecutive days on an official Internet government forfeiture site (www.forfeiture.gov) notice of this order, notice of publication evidencing the plaintiff's intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct, and notice that any person, other than the defendant, having or claiming a legal interest in the property must file a petition with ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.