MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Objection to the court's May 15, 2013, Memorandum and Order, which the court liberally construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. (Filing No. 10.) In his Motion, Plaintiff asks the court to reconsider its ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel and the dismissal of his official capacity claims against Defendants for monetary damages. ( Id. ) The court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff's Motion and finds no good cause to reconsider any portion of its May 15, 2013, Memorandum and Order.
Also pending is Plaintiff's Motion to Disclose Defendants' Addresses. (Filing No. 11.) Plaintiff asks the court to compel Defendants to provide him with the addresses of several individual Defendants in this matter. ( Id. ) However, Plaintiff has not shown that he complied with NECivR 7.1(i), which provides that "this court only considers a discovery motion in which the moving party, in the written motion, shows that after personal consultation with opposing parties and sincere attempts to resolve differences, the parties cannot reach an accord." Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to the court's May 15, 2013, Memorandum and Order, which the court liberally construes as a Motion for Reconsideration (filing no. 10) and Plaintiff's Motion to ...