Buy This Entire Record For
Gray v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
United States District Court, Eighth Circuit
September 6, 2013
GRAYLIN GRAY, Plaintiff,
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ROBERT P. HOUSTON, Director of NDCS, FRANK X. HOPKINS, Deputy Director of Institutions, BRAIN GAGE, Warden of TSCI, RULE, CM, case Manager of TSCI, BARKER, CW, Case Worker of TSCI, JASON. TAYLOR, CM, Case Manager of TSCI, JOHN LEDUC, CM, case Manager of TSCI, RADAR, Ofc., Correctional Officer of TSCI, KRAUSS, Ofc., Correctional Officer of TSCI, and SCHULTS, CM, Case Manager of TSCI, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") (Filing No. 2). Plaintiff is a prisoner incarcerated at the Tecumseh State Prison in Tecumseh, Nebraska. He is an experienced pro se litigant with an extensive history of abusive filings in this Court. As set forth in the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner cannot:
[B]ring a civil action... or proceeding [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action... in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. §1915(g).
Plaintiff has been barred from proceeding IFP by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because he has three or more strikes. See Gray v. City of Lincoln, et. al., No. 4:07CV3220 (D. Neb. Sept. 21, 2007) (dismissing complaint because the Court determined the following six cases had been dismissed as frivolous: Gray v. Condon, No. 4:95CV3177 (D. Neb. June 21, 1995); Gray v. Grammar, No. 4:95CV3446 (D. Neb. Apr. 18, 1996); Gray v. Smith, No. 4:95CV3405 (D. Neb. Mar. 15, 1996); Gray v. Grammer, No. 4:95CV3404 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 1996); Gray v. Smith, No. 4:95CV3339 (D. Neb. Nov. 30, 1995); Gray v. Webber, No. 4:95CV3326 (D. Neb. Jan. 4, 1995)).
Accordingly, plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), or pay the full $350.00 filing fee. In the absence of good cause shown, or the payment of the full filing fee, this action will be dismissed.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2) is denied.
2. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to either show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) or pay the full $350.00 filing fee.
3. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: October 7, 2013: deadline for ...