MARGARET J. SIMMONS-DAVIS, Plaintiff,
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant.
AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Amend Progression Order (Filing No. 56). The court held a telephone conference on August 2, 2013, to discuss the motion. Jonathan V. Rehm represented the plaintiff. Scott P. Moore represented the defendant. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
The defendant's Unopposed Motion to Amend Progression Order (Filing No. 56) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: The provisions of the court's earlier progression orders remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply:
1. Pretrial Disclosures. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3), each party shall serve opposing counsel and file a redacted version as applicable with the following information regarding the evidence it may present at trial other than solely for impeachment purposes as soon as practicable but not later than the date specified:
a. Trial Exhibits - On or before November 1, 2013: A list of all exhibits it expects to offer by providing a numbered listing and permitting examination of such exhibits, designating on the list those exhibits it may offer only if the need arises.
d. Waiver of Objections: Any and all objections to the use of the witnesses, deposition testimony, discovery responses, or exhibits disclosed pursuant to the above subparagraphs, including any objection pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 32(a) that a deponent is available to testify at the trial, shall be made a part of the pretrial order. Failure to list objections (except those under Fed.R.Evid. 402 and 403) is a waiver of such objections, unless excused by the court for good cause shown.
2. Motions in Limine. Any motions in limine shall be filed on or before November 8, 2013.
3. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for November 15, 2013, at 2:30 p.m. in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. The final pretrial conference shall be attended by lead counsel for represented parties. Counsel shall complete prior to the pretrial conference, all items as directed in NECivR 16.2. By the time of the pretrial conference, full preparation for trial shall have been made so that trial may begin immediately thereafter. The pretrial conference will include a discussion of settlement, and counsel shall be prepared through investigation, discovery and communication with clients and insurers, if any, to discuss fully the subject of settlement, including realistic expectations about liability, obstacles to agreement, offers made, and offers which can be made at the conference. Counsel shall be prepared to make additional offers or proposals for settlement in behalf of their clients at the pretrial conference, and counsel shall be prepared to make or opine on recommendations for further negotiations and conferences.
a. Not later than two weeks prior to trial, plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel shall serve on defendant or defendant's counsel a written, updated settlement proposal. Defendant or defendant's counsel shall respond in writing to such proposal not later than one week before trial.
b. In the event the parties mediate their dispute, notice of the mediation shall be given to the staff of the magistrate judge's office. The filing of a mediation reference order will terminate pending motions, without prejudice to refiling. If the mediation is not successful, the moving party may reinstate such a motion by filing a written notice to that effect, and the other parties may respond in accordance with the local rules, regarding the date of the notice as reinstating the response/reply time that remained as of the date the mediation reference order was filed.
c. Notice of settlement shall be given to the trial judge's office as soon as practicable but in any event in time to avoid summoning a jury. If a case settles and notice of settlement is not given in sufficient time to avoid summoning a jury, assessment of jury costs may - and normally will - be made against a party and/or counsel for one or more of the parties. For purposes of this paragraph, a ...