Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States of America v. Carlos Juan-Castaneda
May 13, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CARLOS JUAN-CASTANEDA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge
The Court has received the Modified/Expedited Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR"). The parties have not objected to the PSR. The government adopted the PSR (Filing No. 22). See Order on Sentencing Schedule, ¶ 6. The Court advises the parties that these Tentative Findings are issued with the understanding that, pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the sentencing guidelines are advisory.
1. The Court intends to adopt the PSR at the time of sentencing;
2. If any party wishes to challenge these tentative findings, the party shall immediately file in the court file and serve upon opposing counsel and the Court a motion challenging these tentative findings, supported by (a) such evidentiary materials as are required (giving due regard to the requirements of the local rules of practice respecting the submission of evidentiary materials), (b) a brief as to the law, and (c) if an evidentiary hearing is requested, a statement describing why an evidentiary hearing is necessary and an estimated length of time for the hearing;
3. Absent submission of the information required by paragraph 2 of this Order, these tentative findings are final; and
4. Unless otherwise ordered, any motion challenging these tentative findings shall be resolved at sentencing.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...