Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Julie Lynn Carper v. Jack Besse

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA


April 29, 2013

JULIE LYNN CARPER,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JACK BESSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ) AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Julie Lynn Carper's ("Plaintiff") "Motion to Proceed on Merits and Deny Defendant's Motion to Dismiss" (Filing No. 15), Motion for Default Judgment (Filing No. 17), and "Motion for Hearing and/or Default Judgment" (Filing No. 18). Liberally construed, Plaintiff moves the court to enter default judgment against Defendants because they failed to answer her Complaint. Also pending is Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motions. (Filing No. 19.) Upon careful consideration,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motions (Filing Nos. 15, 17, and 18) are denied because Defendants have properly filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Filing No. 13.) Accordingly, Defendants need not file an answer or other responsive pleading unless the court denies Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

2. Defendants' Motion to Strike Filing Numbers 15, 17, and 18 (Filing No. 19) is denied. However, Plaintiff is cautioned against filing frivolous motions. Filing frivolous motions could result in further action by this court, including sanctions.

BY THE COURT:

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

20130429

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.